Eswatini vs Spain: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Eswatini
1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Spain
0.9625 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
86th
Spain rank
87th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Spain
0123196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9625 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Spain, a difference of 0.0375 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Spain ahead.

Eswatini ranks 86th and Spain ranks 87th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Spain in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Spain Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3397 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
1970s 0.4543 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
1980s 0.5217 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
1990s 0.6254 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
2000s 0.726 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6413 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
2010s 0.9284 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2241 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
2020s 1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9938 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Eswatini or Spain?
Eswatini, at 1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9625 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Spain as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Eswatini and Spain?
0.0375 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Spain?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Spain rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Eswatini ranks 86th and Spain ranks 87th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Spain: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/eswatini/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/eswatini/spain/">Eswatini vs Spain: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.