Eswatini vs Morocco: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Eswatini
1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco
1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
86th
Morocco rank
84th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Morocco
00.250.50.751196119922023

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 86th and Morocco ranks 84th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 5 and Morocco in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Morocco Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3397 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2155 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.4543 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1739 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2805 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.5217 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3837 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.138 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.6254 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5881 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0373 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.726 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7738 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0478 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
2010s 0.9284 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1049 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
2020s 1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9748 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0256 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Eswatini or Morocco?
Morocco, at 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Eswatini and Morocco?
0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Morocco?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Morocco rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Eswatini ranks 86th and Morocco ranks 84th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Morocco: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/eswatini/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/eswatini/morocco/">Eswatini vs Morocco: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.