Costa Rica vs Spain: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Costa Rica
0.9495 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Spain
0.9625 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
89th
Spain rank
87th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Spain
0123196119922023

How they compare

Spain currently reports 0.9625 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9495 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Spain ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 89th and Spain ranks 87th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Spain in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Spain Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1101 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
1970s 0.1448 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
1980s 0.2917 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
1990s 0.8493 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
2000s 1.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2092 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
2010s 1.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0216 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 0.8818 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9938 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Costa Rica or Spain?
Spain, at 0.9625 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9495 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Costa Rica and Spain?
0.013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Spain?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Spain rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Costa Rica ranks 89th and Spain ranks 87th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Spain: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/costa-rica/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/costa-rica/spain/">Costa Rica vs Spain: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.