Congo vs Tunisia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Congo
0.7532 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.7054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
95th
Tunisia rank
98th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Congo
  • Tunisia
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.7532 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0478 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 95th and Tunisia ranks 98th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 5 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2479 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0916 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1563 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0.2669 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1479 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.119 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0.3285 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2444 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0841 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0.3417 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3981 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0563 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 0.4661 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5382 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0721 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 0.6722 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6468 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0255 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.7461 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6999 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0462 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Congo or Tunisia?
Congo, at 0.7532 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Congo and Tunisia?
0.0478 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Tunisia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Congo ranks 95th and Tunisia ranks 98th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Tunisia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/congo-rep/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/congo-rep/tunisia/">Congo vs Tunisia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.