Congo vs Georgia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Congo
0.7532 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia
0.7106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
95th
Georgia rank
96th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Congo
  • Georgia
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.7532 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Georgia, a difference of 0.0426 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Georgia ahead.

Congo ranks 95th and Georgia ranks 96th of 169 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3653 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8844 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 0.4661 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6953 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 0.6722 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8335 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1613 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Georgia
2020s 0.7461 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7559 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Congo or Georgia?
Congo, at 0.7532 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Georgia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Congo and Georgia?
0.0426 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Georgia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Congo and Georgia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Congo ranks 95th and Georgia ranks 96th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Georgia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/congo-rep/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/congo-rep/georgia/">Congo vs Georgia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.