China vs Poland: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

China
3.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland
4.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
32nd
Poland rank
29th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • China
  • Poland
010203040196119922023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 4.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times China's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

China ranks 32nd and Poland ranks 29th of 169 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 2.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 37.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 34.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
1970s 3.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 38.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 35.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
1980s 3.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 28.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 25.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
1990s 3.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 21.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 17.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
2000s 4.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
2010s 3.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
2020s 3.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), China or Poland?
Poland, at 4.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between China and Poland?
0.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Poland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Poland rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
China ranks 32nd and Poland ranks 29th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Poland: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/china/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/china/poland/">China vs Poland: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.