Chad vs Namibia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chad
0.0835 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.1051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
150th
Namibia rank
147th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chad
  • Namibia
0.040.060.080.10.12196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.1051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0835 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.0216 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 150th and Namibia ranks 147th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0419 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1970s 0.0541 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0466 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1980s 0.0892 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0524 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0367 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1990s 0.0888 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0611 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0277 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2000s 0.0672 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0814 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0142 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0822 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0979 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0157 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0826 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0225 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chad or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.1051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0835 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chad and Namibia?
0.0216 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Namibia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Namibia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chad ranks 150th and Namibia ranks 147th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Namibia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chad/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chad/namibia/">Chad vs Namibia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.