Central African Republic vs South Sudan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Central African Republic
0.3852 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Sudan
0.3993 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
120th
South Sudan rank
119th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Central African Republic
  • South Sudan
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 0.3993 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.3852 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.0141 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 120th and South Sudan ranks 119th of 169 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 0.422 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2344 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1876 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 0.3734 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3769 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Central African Republic or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 0.3993 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.3852 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Central African Republic and South Sudan?
0.0141 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and South Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and South Sudan rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Central African Republic ranks 120th and South Sudan ranks 119th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs South Sudan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/central-african-republic/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/central-african-republic/south-sudan/">Central African Republic vs South Sudan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.