Canada vs Gambia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Canada
0.1831 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
0.1751 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
139th
Gambia rank
140th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Canada
  • Gambia
0.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 0.1831 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1751 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 0.008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Gambia ahead.

Canada ranks 139th and Gambia ranks 140th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 2 and Gambia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Gambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0617 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
1970s 0.0652 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1157 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0505 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 0.0772 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0862 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 0.1038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0929 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
2000s 0.1337 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0199 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
2010s 0.1531 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1629 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 0.1712 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1751 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Canada or Gambia?
Canada, at 0.1831 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1751 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Canada and Gambia?
0.008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Gambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Gambia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Canada ranks 139th and Gambia ranks 140th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Gambia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/canada/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/canada/gambia-the/">Canada vs Gambia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.