Cameroon vs France: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Cameroon
4.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
France
4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon rank
30th
France rank
31st

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Cameroon
  • France
02468196119922023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 4.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in France, a difference of 0.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.1 times France's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was France ahead.

Cameroon ranks 30th and France ranks 31st of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 1 and France in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon France Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7706 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre France
1970s 0.9498 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre France
1980s 0.857 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre France
1990s 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre France
2000s 2.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre France
2010s 3.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0746 1000 Int$ per square kilometre France
2020s 4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Cameroon or France?
Cameroon, at 4.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in France as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Cameroon and France?
0.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and France?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and France rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Cameroon ranks 30th and France ranks 31st of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs France: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/cameroon/france/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/cameroon/france/">Cameroon vs France: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.