Brazil vs Sweden: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Brazil
0.4766 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.4977 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
113th
Sweden rank
111th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Brazil
  • Sweden
0.40.60.811.2196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.4977 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4766 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.0211 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Brazil ranks 113th and Sweden ranks 111th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8959 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3828 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 0.5627 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7292 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1665 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 0.4907 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2137 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0.4797 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2312 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.5406 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5456 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.5104 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.505 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 0.463 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.517 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Brazil or Sweden?
Sweden, at 0.4977 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4766 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Brazil and Sweden?
0.0211 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sweden?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Sweden rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Brazil ranks 113th and Sweden ranks 111th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Sweden: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/brazil/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/brazil/sweden/">Brazil vs Sweden: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.