Bhutan vs Brazil: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bhutan
0.4553 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil
0.4766 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
115th
Brazil rank
113th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Brazil
0.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.4766 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4553 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0213 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.

Bhutan ranks 115th and Brazil ranks 113th of 169 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Brazil Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3692 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
1970s 0.1817 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5627 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.381 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 0.2429 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4907 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2477 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 0.2833 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4797 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1963 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 0.4382 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5406 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 0.5082 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5104 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 0.4592 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.463 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bhutan or Brazil?
Brazil, at 0.4766 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4553 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bhutan and Brazil?
0.0213 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Brazil?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Brazil rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Bhutan ranks 115th and Brazil ranks 113th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Brazil: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/bhutan/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/bhutan/brazil/">Bhutan vs Brazil: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.