Austria vs Barbados: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Austria
1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados
1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Austria rank
58th
Barbados rank
59th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Austria
  • Barbados
051015196119922023

How they compare

Austria currently reports 1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Austria ranks 58th and Barbados ranks 59th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Barbados in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Barbados Difference Ahead
1960s 9.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 5.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 3.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 2.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 2.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4371 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
2010s 2.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9077 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
2020s 2.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6632 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Austria or Barbados?
Austria, at 1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Austria and Barbados?
0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Barbados?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Austria and Barbados rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Austria ranks 58th and Barbados ranks 59th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Barbados: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/austria/barbados/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/austria/barbados/">Austria vs Barbados: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.