Armenia vs China: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Armenia
3.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China
3.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Armenia rank
35th
China rank
32nd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Armenia
  • China
23456196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 3.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Armenia, a difference of 0.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1997 it was China ahead.

Armenia ranks 35th and China ranks 32nd of 169 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and China in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia China Difference Ahead
1990s 3.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6656 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2000s 4.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3672 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Armenia
2010s 4.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Armenia
2020s 3.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4094 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Armenia or China?
China, at 3.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Armenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Armenia and China?
0.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and China?
27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Armenia and China rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Armenia ranks 35th and China ranks 32nd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs China: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/armenia/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/armenia/china/">Armenia vs China: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.