Angola vs Barbados: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Angola
1.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados
1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
60th
Barbados rank
59th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Angola
  • Barbados
051015196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Angola ranks 60th and Barbados ranks 59th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Barbados in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Barbados Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1913 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 0.1991 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 0.1905 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 0.3043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 1.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 1.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
2020s 1.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Angola or Barbados?
Barbados, at 1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Angola and Barbados?
0.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Barbados?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Barbados rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Angola ranks 60th and Barbados ranks 59th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Barbados: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/angola/barbados/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/angola/barbados/">Angola vs Barbados: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.