Algeria vs Brazil: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Algeria
0.4893 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil
0.4766 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Algeria rank
112th
Brazil rank
113th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Algeria
  • Brazil
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Algeria currently reports 0.4893 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4766 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.0127 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.

Algeria ranks 112th and Brazil ranks 113th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 1 and Brazil in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Algeria Brazil Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0232 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4898 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
1970s 0.0422 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5627 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5206 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 0.0733 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4907 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4174 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 0.1074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4797 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3723 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 0.1885 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5406 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3521 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 0.4678 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5104 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0425 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 0.4728 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.463 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Algeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Algeria or Brazil?
Algeria, at 0.4893 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4766 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Algeria and Brazil?
0.0127 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Algeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Brazil?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Algeria and Brazil rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Algeria ranks 112th and Brazil ranks 113th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Algeria vs Brazil: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/algeria/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/algeria/brazil/">Algeria vs Brazil: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.