Mauritania vs Puerto Rico: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Mauritania
0.0005 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Puerto Rico
0.0005 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Mauritania rank
163rd
Puerto Rico rank
162nd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Mauritania
  • Puerto Rico
00.0010.0020.0030.004196119922024

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person in Mauritania, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Mauritania ranks 163rd and Puerto Rico ranks 162nd of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0015 1000 Int$ per person 0.0041 1000 Int$ per person 0.0026 1000 Int$ per person Puerto Rico
1970s 0.0012 1000 Int$ per person 0.0029 1000 Int$ per person 0.0018 1000 Int$ per person Puerto Rico
1980s 0.0008 1000 Int$ per person 0.0024 1000 Int$ per person 0.0016 1000 Int$ per person Puerto Rico
1990s 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person 0.001 1000 Int$ per person 0.0004 1000 Int$ per person Puerto Rico
2000s 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person 0.0008 1000 Int$ per person 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person Puerto Rico
2010s 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person Mauritania
2020s 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Mauritania or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person in Mauritania as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Mauritania and Puerto Rico?
0 1000 Int$ per person, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Puerto Rico?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Mauritania and Puerto Rico rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Mauritania ranks 163rd and Puerto Rico ranks 162nd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Puerto Rico: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/mauritania/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/mauritania/puerto-rico-us/">Mauritania vs Puerto Rico: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,784 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.