Lithuania vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Lithuania
0.023 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
0.023 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Lithuania rank
57th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
58th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Lithuania
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
0.0250.050.0750.10.1250.15196119922024

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0.023 1000 Int$ per person against 0.023 1000 Int$ per person in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 57th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 58th of 169 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 3 and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1125 1000 Int$ per person 0.0245 1000 Int$ per person 0.088 1000 Int$ per person Lithuania
2000s 0.0753 1000 Int$ per person 0.0272 1000 Int$ per person 0.048 1000 Int$ per person Lithuania
2010s 0.035 1000 Int$ per person 0.0314 1000 Int$ per person 0.0036 1000 Int$ per person Lithuania
2020s 0.0221 1000 Int$ per person 0.0253 1000 Int$ per person 0.0031 1000 Int$ per person Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Lithuania or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Lithuania, at 0.023 1000 Int$ per person against 0.023 1000 Int$ per person in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Lithuania and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
0 1000 Int$ per person, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Lithuania and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Lithuania ranks 57th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 58th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/lithuania/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/lithuania/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Lithuania vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,784 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.