French Polynesia vs Malta: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

French Polynesia
0.0024 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Malta
0.003 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
French Polynesia rank
146th
Malta rank
143rd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Malta
00.0050.010.0150.020.025196119922024

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.003 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0024 1000 Int$ per person in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times French Polynesia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was French Polynesia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 146th and Malta ranks 143rd of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 3 and Malta in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0239 1000 Int$ per person 0.0169 1000 Int$ per person 0.007 1000 Int$ per person French Polynesia
1970s 0.0206 1000 Int$ per person 0.0163 1000 Int$ per person 0.0043 1000 Int$ per person French Polynesia
1980s 0.0137 1000 Int$ per person 0.0118 1000 Int$ per person 0.0019 1000 Int$ per person French Polynesia
1990s 0.0059 1000 Int$ per person 0.0196 1000 Int$ per person 0.0137 1000 Int$ per person Malta
2000s 0.004 1000 Int$ per person 0.0135 1000 Int$ per person 0.0095 1000 Int$ per person Malta
2010s 0.003 1000 Int$ per person 0.0065 1000 Int$ per person 0.0036 1000 Int$ per person Malta
2020s 0.0025 1000 Int$ per person 0.0034 1000 Int$ per person 0.0009 1000 Int$ per person Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), French Polynesia or Malta?
Malta, at 0.003 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0024 1000 Int$ per person in French Polynesia as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between French Polynesia and Malta?
0.0006 1000 Int$ per person, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Malta?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do French Polynesia and Malta rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
French Polynesia ranks 146th and Malta ranks 143rd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Malta: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/french-polynesia/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/french-polynesia/malta/">French Polynesia vs Malta: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,784 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.