Faroe Islands vs Guatemala: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Faroe Islands
0.007 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Guatemala
0.0076 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Faroe Islands rank
118th
Guatemala rank
116th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Guatemala
00.0030.0050.0070.010.013196119922024

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.0076 1000 Int$ per person against 0.007 1000 Int$ per person in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Faroe Islands's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Faroe Islands ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 118th and Guatemala ranks 116th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 4 and Guatemala in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0107 1000 Int$ per person 0.0012 1000 Int$ per person 0.0095 1000 Int$ per person Faroe Islands
1970s 0.0078 1000 Int$ per person 0.0019 1000 Int$ per person 0.0059 1000 Int$ per person Faroe Islands
1980s 0.0075 1000 Int$ per person 0.0021 1000 Int$ per person 0.0053 1000 Int$ per person Faroe Islands
1990s 0.0083 1000 Int$ per person 0.0048 1000 Int$ per person 0.0034 1000 Int$ per person Faroe Islands
2000s 0.0075 1000 Int$ per person 0.0076 1000 Int$ per person 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person Guatemala
2010s 0.0077 1000 Int$ per person 0.0084 1000 Int$ per person 0.0007 1000 Int$ per person Guatemala
2020s 0.0071 1000 Int$ per person 0.0082 1000 Int$ per person 0.0011 1000 Int$ per person Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Faroe Islands or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 0.0076 1000 Int$ per person against 0.007 1000 Int$ per person in Faroe Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Faroe Islands and Guatemala?
0.0006 1000 Int$ per person, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Guatemala?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Faroe Islands and Guatemala rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Faroe Islands ranks 118th and Guatemala ranks 116th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Guatemala: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/faroe-islands/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/faroe-islands/guatemala/">Faroe Islands vs Guatemala: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,784 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.