Equatorial Guinea vs Sweden: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Equatorial Guinea
0.0217 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Sweden
0.0208 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
63rd
Sweden rank
64th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sweden
0.020.030.040.050.06196119922024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0217 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0208 1000 Int$ per person in Sweden, a difference of 0.0009 1000 Int$ per person.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 63rd and Sweden ranks 64th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 4 and Sweden in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0372 1000 Int$ per person 0.0473 1000 Int$ per person 0.0101 1000 Int$ per person Sweden
1970s 0.0329 1000 Int$ per person 0.0363 1000 Int$ per person 0.0034 1000 Int$ per person Sweden
1980s 0.0299 1000 Int$ per person 0.0343 1000 Int$ per person 0.0043 1000 Int$ per person Sweden
1990s 0.0331 1000 Int$ per person 0.0331 1000 Int$ per person 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0285 1000 Int$ per person 0.0246 1000 Int$ per person 0.0039 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.027 1000 Int$ per person 0.021 1000 Int$ per person 0.0059 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0228 1000 Int$ per person 0.0203 1000 Int$ per person 0.0025 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Equatorial Guinea or Sweden?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0217 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0208 1000 Int$ per person in Sweden as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Equatorial Guinea and Sweden?
0.0009 1000 Int$ per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sweden?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sweden rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 63rd and Sweden ranks 64th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sweden: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/sweden/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sweden: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,784 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.