Equatorial Guinea vs Liberia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Equatorial Guinea
0.0217 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Liberia
0.0195 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
63rd
Liberia rank
65th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Liberia
00.010.020.030.04196119922024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0217 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0195 1000 Int$ per person in Liberia, a difference of 0.0022 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Liberia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 63rd and Liberia ranks 65th of 169 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Liberia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0372 1000 Int$ per person 0.0366 1000 Int$ per person 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.0329 1000 Int$ per person 0.031 1000 Int$ per person 0.0019 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0299 1000 Int$ per person 0.0271 1000 Int$ per person 0.0028 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0331 1000 Int$ per person 0.0245 1000 Int$ per person 0.0087 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0285 1000 Int$ per person 0.0271 1000 Int$ per person 0.0014 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.027 1000 Int$ per person 0.0221 1000 Int$ per person 0.0049 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0228 1000 Int$ per person 0.0204 1000 Int$ per person 0.0024 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Equatorial Guinea or Liberia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0217 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0195 1000 Int$ per person in Liberia as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Equatorial Guinea and Liberia?
0.0022 1000 Int$ per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Liberia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Liberia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 63rd and Liberia ranks 65th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Liberia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/liberia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Liberia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,784 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.