Dominican Republic vs Eswatini: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Dominican Republic
0.0133 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Eswatini
0.0139 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Dominican Republic rank
90th
Eswatini rank
88th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Eswatini
0.0050.0070.010.0130.0150.018196119922024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0139 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0133 1000 Int$ per person in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 90th and Eswatini ranks 88th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0173 1000 Int$ per person 0.015 1000 Int$ per person 0.0023 1000 Int$ per person Dominican Republic
1970s 0.0151 1000 Int$ per person 0.0155 1000 Int$ per person 0.0004 1000 Int$ per person Eswatini
1980s 0.0083 1000 Int$ per person 0.0128 1000 Int$ per person 0.0045 1000 Int$ per person Eswatini
1990s 0.0076 1000 Int$ per person 0.0111 1000 Int$ per person 0.0036 1000 Int$ per person Eswatini
2000s 0.0078 1000 Int$ per person 0.0116 1000 Int$ per person 0.0038 1000 Int$ per person Eswatini
2010s 0.0079 1000 Int$ per person 0.014 1000 Int$ per person 0.006 1000 Int$ per person Eswatini
2020s 0.0102 1000 Int$ per person 0.0141 1000 Int$ per person 0.0039 1000 Int$ per person Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Dominican Republic or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.0139 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0133 1000 Int$ per person in Dominican Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Dominican Republic and Eswatini?
0.0006 1000 Int$ per person, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Eswatini?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Dominican Republic and Eswatini rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Dominican Republic ranks 90th and Eswatini ranks 88th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Eswatini: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/dominican-republic/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/dominican-republic/eswatini/">Dominican Republic vs Eswatini: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,784 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.