Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bhutan
0.022 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
0.0217 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Bhutan rank
62nd
Equatorial Guinea rank
63rd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.010.020.030.04196119922024

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0.022 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0217 1000 Int$ per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Bhutan ranks 62nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 63rd of 169 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0256 1000 Int$ per person 0.0372 1000 Int$ per person 0.0116 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.0236 1000 Int$ per person 0.0329 1000 Int$ per person 0.0093 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0226 1000 Int$ per person 0.0299 1000 Int$ per person 0.0074 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0212 1000 Int$ per person 0.0331 1000 Int$ per person 0.0119 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0258 1000 Int$ per person 0.0285 1000 Int$ per person 0.0027 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0263 1000 Int$ per person 0.027 1000 Int$ per person 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0224 1000 Int$ per person 0.0228 1000 Int$ per person 0.0004 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bhutan or Equatorial Guinea?
Bhutan, at 0.022 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0217 1000 Int$ per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0003 1000 Int$ per person, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Bhutan ranks 62nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 63rd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/bhutan/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/bhutan/equatorial-guinea/">Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,784 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.