Eswatini vs Palestine: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Eswatini
0.1569 % change on previous year
in 2024
Palestine
0.1789 % change on previous year
in 2022
Eswatini rank
120th
Palestine rank
118th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Palestine
-50050100150196219932024

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 0.1789 % change on previous year against 0.1569 % change on previous year in Eswatini, a difference of 0.022 % change on previous year.

That makes Palestine's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Palestine ahead.

Eswatini ranks 120th and Palestine ranks 118th of 211 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Palestine in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s 1.14 % change on previous year 6.1 % change on previous year 4.96 % change on previous year Palestine
2000s 2.12 % change on previous year 1.57 % change on previous year 0.5507 % change on previous year Eswatini
2010s 2.23 % change on previous year 7.55 % change on previous year 5.32 % change on previous year Palestine
2020s -0.5007 % change on previous year 12.1 % change on previous year 12.6 % change on previous year Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Eswatini or Palestine?
Palestine, at 0.1789 % change on previous year against 0.1569 % change on previous year in Eswatini as of 2022.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Eswatini and Palestine?
0.022 % change on previous year, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Palestine?
28 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2022.
How do Eswatini and Palestine rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Eswatini ranks 120th and Palestine ranks 118th of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Palestine: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/eswatini/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/eswatini/west-bank-and-gaza/">Eswatini vs Palestine: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 13,643 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.