China, mainland vs Serbia and Montenegro: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

China, mainland
0.9361 % change on previous year
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro
0.9399 % change on previous year
in 2005
China, mainland rank
110th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
108th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • China, mainland
  • Serbia and Montenegro
-2002040196219932024

How they compare

Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 0.9399 % change on previous year against 0.9361 % change on previous year in China, mainland, a difference of 0.0038 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1993 it was China, mainland ahead.

China, mainland ranks 110th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 108th of 211 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, China, mainland averaged higher in 1 and Serbia and Montenegro in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, mainland Serbia and Montenegro Difference Ahead
1990s 3.96 % change on previous year 2.47 % change on previous year 1.49 % change on previous year China, mainland
2000s -0.4049 % change on previous year 7.2 % change on previous year 7.61 % change on previous year Serbia and Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), China, mainland or Serbia and Montenegro?
Serbia and Montenegro, at 0.9399 % change on previous year against 0.9361 % change on previous year in China, mainland as of 2005.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between China, mainland and Serbia and Montenegro?
0.0038 % change on previous year, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and Serbia and Montenegro?
13 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2005.
How do China, mainland and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
China, mainland ranks 110th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 108th of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, mainland vs Serbia and Montenegro: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/china-mainland/serbia-and-montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/china-mainland/serbia-and-montenegro/">China, mainland vs Serbia and Montenegro: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 13,643 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.