Malta vs Zimbabwe: Root or tuber harvesting machines — Import Value
Root or tuber harvesting machines — Import Value over time
- Malta
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 13 1000 USD against 12 1000 USD in Malta, a difference of 1 1000 USD.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 80th and Zimbabwe ranks 78th of 86 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher root or tuber harvesting machines — import value, Malta or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 13 1000 USD against 12 1000 USD in Malta as of 2007.
- What is the difference in root or tuber harvesting machines — import value between Malta and Zimbabwe?
- 1 1000 USD, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2007.
- How do Malta and Zimbabwe rank globally for root or tuber harvesting machines — import value?
- Malta ranks 80th and Zimbabwe ranks 78th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Root or tuber harvesting machines — Import Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Important notice: FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery is no longer active. The latest online version of the database has as reference year 2009 (with data collected in year 2011). FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery provides statistical series on Agricultural Machinery and Equipment statistical series referring to the following items: tractors, harvesters and threshers, irrigation pumps, milking machines, hand tools, and soil machines. The database includes estimates of agriculture machinery in use and value of import and export of agriculture machinery.