Iceland vs Malta: Root or tuber harvesting machines — Import Value
Root or tuber harvesting machines — Import Value over time
- Iceland
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 12 1000 USD against 5 1000 USD in Iceland, a difference of 7 1000 USD.
That makes Malta's figure about 2.4 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 76th and Malta ranks 75th of 79 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher root or tuber harvesting machines — import value, Iceland or Malta?
- Malta, at 12 1000 USD against 5 1000 USD in Iceland as of 2009.
- What is the difference in root or tuber harvesting machines — import value between Iceland and Malta?
- 7 1000 USD, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Malta?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2008.
- How do Iceland and Malta rank globally for root or tuber harvesting machines — import value?
- Iceland ranks 76th and Malta ranks 75th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Root or tuber harvesting machines — Import Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Important notice: FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery is no longer active. The latest online version of the database has as reference year 2009 (with data collected in year 2011). FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery provides statistical series on Agricultural Machinery and Equipment statistical series referring to the following items: tractors, harvesters and threshers, irrigation pumps, milking machines, hand tools, and soil machines. The database includes estimates of agriculture machinery in use and value of import and export of agriculture machinery.