Egypt vs Latvia: Root or tuber harvesting machines — Import Value
Root or tuber harvesting machines — Import Value over time
- Egypt
- Latvia
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 795 1000 USD against 752 1000 USD in Latvia, a difference of 43 1000 USD.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 34th and Latvia ranks 35th of 79 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher root or tuber harvesting machines — import value, Egypt or Latvia?
- Egypt, at 795 1000 USD against 752 1000 USD in Latvia as of 2007.
- What is the difference in root or tuber harvesting machines — import value between Egypt and Latvia?
- 43 1000 USD, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Latvia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2007.
- How do Egypt and Latvia rank globally for root or tuber harvesting machines — import value?
- Egypt ranks 34th and Latvia ranks 35th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Root or tuber harvesting machines — Import Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Important notice: FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery is no longer active. The latest online version of the database has as reference year 2009 (with data collected in year 2011). FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery provides statistical series on Agricultural Machinery and Equipment statistical series referring to the following items: tractors, harvesters and threshers, irrigation pumps, milking machines, hand tools, and soil machines. The database includes estimates of agriculture machinery in use and value of import and export of agriculture machinery.