Belgium vs Eastern Europe: Root or tuber harvesting machines — Import Value
Root or tuber harvesting machines — Import Value over time
- Belgium
- Eastern Europe
How they compare
Eastern Europe currently reports 50,799 1000 USD against 15,565 1000 USD in Belgium, a difference of 35,234 1000 USD.
That makes Eastern Europe's figure about 3.3 times Belgium's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Eastern Europe has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 4th and Eastern Europe ranks 5th of 79 countries.
Eastern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher root or tuber harvesting machines — import value, Belgium or Eastern Europe?
- Eastern Europe, at 50,799 1000 USD against 15,565 1000 USD in Belgium as of 2009.
- What is the difference in root or tuber harvesting machines — import value between Belgium and Eastern Europe?
- 35,234 1000 USD, with Eastern Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Eastern Europe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2009.
- How do Belgium and Eastern Europe rank globally for root or tuber harvesting machines — import value?
- Belgium ranks 4th and Eastern Europe ranks 5th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Root or tuber harvesting machines — Import Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Important notice: FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery is no longer active. The latest online version of the database has as reference year 2009 (with data collected in year 2011). FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery provides statistical series on Agricultural Machinery and Equipment statistical series referring to the following items: tractors, harvesters and threshers, irrigation pumps, milking machines, hand tools, and soil machines. The database includes estimates of agriculture machinery in use and value of import and export of agriculture machinery.