Finland vs Oceania: Root or tuber harvesting machines — Import Quantity
Root or tuber harvesting machines — Import Quantity over time
- Finland
- Oceania
How they compare
Finland currently reports 67 No against 10 No in Oceania, a difference of 57 No.
That makes Finland's figure about 6.7 times Oceania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 29th and Oceania ranks 17th of 64 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher root or tuber harvesting machines — import quantity, Finland or Oceania?
- Finland, at 67 No against 10 No in Oceania as of 2009.
- What is the difference in root or tuber harvesting machines — import quantity between Finland and Oceania?
- 57 No, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Oceania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2009.
- How do Finland and Oceania rank globally for root or tuber harvesting machines — import quantity?
- Finland ranks 29th and Oceania ranks 17th of 64 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Root or tuber harvesting machines — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Important notice: FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery is no longer active. The latest online version of the database has as reference year 2009 (with data collected in year 2011). FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery provides statistical series on Agricultural Machinery and Equipment statistical series referring to the following items: tractors, harvesters and threshers, irrigation pumps, milking machines, hand tools, and soil machines. The database includes estimates of agriculture machinery in use and value of import and export of agriculture machinery.