Eastern Europe vs Kazakhstan: Root or tuber harvesting machines — Import Quantity
Root or tuber harvesting machines — Import Quantity over time
- Eastern Europe
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Eastern Europe currently reports 2,254 No against 1,856 No in Kazakhstan, a difference of 398 No.
That makes Eastern Europe's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Eastern Europe has been ahead every year.
Eastern Europe ranks 5th and Kazakhstan ranks 3rd of 27 groups.
Eastern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher root or tuber harvesting machines — import quantity, Eastern Europe or Kazakhstan?
- Eastern Europe, at 2,254 No against 1,856 No in Kazakhstan as of 2009.
- What is the difference in root or tuber harvesting machines — import quantity between Eastern Europe and Kazakhstan?
- 398 No, with Eastern Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Europe and Kazakhstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2008.
- How do Eastern Europe and Kazakhstan rank globally for root or tuber harvesting machines — import quantity?
- Eastern Europe ranks 5th and Kazakhstan ranks 3rd of 27 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Root or tuber harvesting machines — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Important notice: FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery is no longer active. The latest online version of the database has as reference year 2009 (with data collected in year 2011). FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery provides statistical series on Agricultural Machinery and Equipment statistical series referring to the following items: tractors, harvesters and threshers, irrigation pumps, milking machines, hand tools, and soil machines. The database includes estimates of agriculture machinery in use and value of import and export of agriculture machinery.