Chad vs Malawi: Rice yield
Chad
703.1 kg per hectare
in 2011
Malawi
710 kg per hectare
in 2011
Chad rank
20th
Malawi rank
19th
Rice yield over time
- Chad
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 710 kg per hectare against 703.1 kg per hectare in Chad, a difference of 6.9 kg per hectare.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Malawi ahead.
Chad ranks 20th and Malawi ranks 19th of 37 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 491.8 kg per hectare | 700 kg per hectare | 208.2 kg per hectare | Malawi |
| 1980s | 500.92 kg per hectare | 530.59 kg per hectare | 29.67 kg per hectare | Malawi |
| 1990s | 422.44 kg per hectare | 493.93 kg per hectare | 71.49 kg per hectare | Malawi |
| 2000s | 527.18 kg per hectare | 599.08 kg per hectare | 71.9 kg per hectare | Malawi |
| 2010s | 656.1 kg per hectare | 610.75 kg per hectare | 45.35 kg per hectare | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice yield, Chad or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 710 kg per hectare against 703.1 kg per hectare in Chad as of 2011.
- What is the difference in rice yield between Chad and Malawi?
- 6.9 kg per hectare, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Malawi?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2011.
- How do Chad and Malawi rank globally for rice yield?
- Chad ranks 20th and Malawi ranks 19th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as Rice yield (kg per hectare). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Rice yield, measured as kilograms per hectare of harvested land. Production data on relate to crops harvested for dry grain only. Crop harvested for hay or harvested green for food, feed, or silage and those used for grazing are excluded.