Eswatini vs South Sudan: Rice — Production, per square kilometre
Eswatini
0.0581 t per square kilometre
in 2023
South Sudan
0.0522 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
84th
South Sudan rank
86th
Rice — Production, per square kilometre over time
- Eswatini
- South Sudan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.0581 t per square kilometre against 0.0522 t per square kilometre in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0059 t per square kilometre.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 84th and South Sudan ranks 86th of 120 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0528 t per square kilometre | 0.0254 t per square kilometre | 0.0274 t per square kilometre | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.0581 t per square kilometre | 0.0482 t per square kilometre | 0.01 t per square kilometre | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — production, per square kilometre, Eswatini or South Sudan?
- Eswatini, at 0.0581 t per square kilometre against 0.0522 t per square kilometre in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in rice — production, per square kilometre between Eswatini and South Sudan?
- 0.0059 t per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and South Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and South Sudan rank globally for rice — production, per square kilometre?
- Eswatini ranks 84th and South Sudan ranks 86th of 120 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Rice — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.