Paraguay vs Peru: Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Paraguay
0.9662 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Paraguay rank
39th
Peru rank
37th

Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Paraguay
  • Peru
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9662 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Paraguay, a difference of 0.0738 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.

Paraguay ranks 39th and Peru ranks 37th of 102 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Paraguay Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0185 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0902 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru
1970s 0.0512 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.164 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1128 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru
1980s 0.0723 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2737 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru
1990s 0.0739 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3754 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru
2000s 0.1245 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6987 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5742 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru
2010s 0.7032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9365 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2333 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru
2020s 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0169 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Paraguay or Peru?
Peru, at 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9662 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Paraguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Paraguay and Peru?
0.0738 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Peru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Paraguay and Peru rank globally for rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Paraguay ranks 39th and Peru ranks 37th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Paraguay vs Peru: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/paraguay/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/paraguay/peru/">Paraguay vs Peru: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,836 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.