Niger vs Zambia: Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Niger
0.044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Niger rank
79th
Zambia rank
82nd

Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Niger
  • Zambia
00.010.020.030.04196119922023

How they compare

Niger currently reports 0.044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Niger's figure about 1.3 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Niger ahead.

Niger ranks 79th and Zambia ranks 82nd of 102 countries.

Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Niger Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0119 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Niger
1970s 0.0097 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0089 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Niger
1980s 0.0162 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Niger
1990s 0.0223 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0048 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0175 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Niger
2000s 0.0196 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0078 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Niger
2010s 0.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0213 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Niger
2020s 0.0414 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0297 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Niger or Zambia?
Niger, at 0.044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Niger and Zambia?
0.011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Zambia?
42 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Niger and Zambia rank globally for rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Niger ranks 79th and Zambia ranks 82nd of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Niger vs Zambia: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/niger/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/niger/zambia/">Niger vs Zambia: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,836 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.