Malaysia vs Uruguay: Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Malaysia
2.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
3.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia rank
21st
Uruguay rank
20th

Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Malaysia
  • Uruguay
01234196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 3.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malaysia, a difference of 0.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 21st and Uruguay ranks 20th of 102 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 6 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 1.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1922 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1970s 2.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3994 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1980s 2.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8419 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1990s 2.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6995 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 2.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1055 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 3.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0983 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 2.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Malaysia or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 3.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malaysia as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Malaysia and Uruguay?
0.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malaysia and Uruguay rank globally for rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Malaysia ranks 21st and Uruguay ranks 20th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Uruguay: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/uruguay/">Malaysia vs Uruguay: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,836 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.