Malaysia vs Rwanda: Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Malaysia
2.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
2.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia rank
21st
Rwanda rank
24th

Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Malaysia
  • Rwanda
0123196119922023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 2.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.

Across all 60 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.

Malaysia ranks 21st and Rwanda ranks 24th of 102 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 1.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1970s 2.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0389 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1980s 2.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1990s 2.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1507 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 2.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7491 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 3.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 2.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Malaysia or Rwanda?
Malaysia, at 2.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Malaysia and Rwanda?
0.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Rwanda?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Malaysia and Rwanda rank globally for rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Malaysia ranks 21st and Rwanda ranks 24th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Rwanda: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/rwanda/">Malaysia vs Rwanda: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,836 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.