Indonesia vs Nepal: Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Indonesia
11.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
15.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia rank
9th
Nepal rank
7th

Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Indonesia
  • Nepal
51015196119922023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 15.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 11.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Indonesia, a difference of 4.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.4 times Indonesia's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nepal ahead.

Indonesia ranks 9th and Nepal ranks 7th of 102 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 2.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
1970s 4.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
1980s 8.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6624 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Indonesia
1990s 10.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8141 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2000s 11.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1874 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
2010s 12.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 13.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
2020s 11.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 14.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Indonesia or Nepal?
Nepal, at 15.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 11.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Indonesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Indonesia and Nepal?
4.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Nepal rank globally for rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Indonesia ranks 9th and Nepal ranks 7th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Nepal: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/nepal/">Indonesia vs Nepal: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,836 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.