Eswatini vs Zambia: Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Eswatini
0.0227 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
85th
Zambia rank
82nd

Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Eswatini
  • Zambia
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0227 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0103 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.5 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 85th and Zambia ranks 82nd of 102 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1547 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1545 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.1199 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1192 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.0654 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0612 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.0753 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0048 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0704 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.0127 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.0192 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0213 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.0227 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0297 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0069 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Eswatini or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0227 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Eswatini and Zambia?
0.0103 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Zambia?
42 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Zambia rank globally for rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Eswatini ranks 85th and Zambia ranks 82nd of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Zambia: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/zambia/">Eswatini vs Zambia: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,836 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.