Eswatini vs Iraq: Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Eswatini
0.0227 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iraq
0.0114 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
85th
Iraq rank
88th

Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Eswatini
  • Iraq
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0227 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0114 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Iraq, a difference of 0.0113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 2.0 times Iraq's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 85th and Iraq ranks 88th of 102 countries.

Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Iraq Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1401 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1844 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0443 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
1970s 0.1199 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.155 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0351 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
1980s 0.0654 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1404 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
1990s 0.0272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2232 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.196 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
2000s 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1929 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
2010s 0.0192 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2483 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2291 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
2020s 0.0227 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1824 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Eswatini or Iraq?
Eswatini, at 0.0227 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0114 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Iraq as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Eswatini and Iraq?
0.0113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Iraq?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Iraq rank globally for rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Eswatini ranks 85th and Iraq ranks 88th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Iraq: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/iraq/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/iraq/">Eswatini vs Iraq: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,836 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.