Congo vs South Africa: Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Congo
0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
95th
South Africa rank
97th

Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Congo
  • South Africa
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times South Africa's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 95th and South Africa ranks 97th of 102 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0.0052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Congo or South Africa?
Congo, at 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Congo and South Africa?
0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and South Africa rank globally for rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Congo ranks 95th and South Africa ranks 97th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs South Africa: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/south-africa/">Congo vs South Africa: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,836 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.