Congo vs Gabon: Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Congo
0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gabon
0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
95th
Gabon rank
93rd

Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Congo
  • Gabon
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196119922023

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Gabon's figure about 2.3 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 95th and Gabon ranks 93rd of 102 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Gabon in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Gabon Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0049 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0.0052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gabon
2010s 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0025 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gabon
2020s 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gabon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Congo or Gabon?
Gabon, at 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Congo and Gabon?
0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Gabon?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Gabon rank globally for rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Congo ranks 95th and Gabon ranks 93rd of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Gabon: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/gabon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/gabon/">Congo vs Gabon: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,836 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.