Chile vs Morocco: Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Chile
0.0575 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco
0.0493 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
75th
Morocco rank
78th

Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Chile
  • Morocco
00.0250.050.0750.1196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0575 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0493 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Morocco, a difference of 0.0082 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Morocco's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 75th and Morocco ranks 78th of 102 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Morocco Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0417 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0236 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0181 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.0473 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0168 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0305 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.0728 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0148 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.058 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.0632 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0277 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0355 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.0692 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0393 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.0776 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0447 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0328 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.0692 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0486 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0206 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Chile or Morocco?
Chile, at 0.0575 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0493 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Morocco as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Chile and Morocco?
0.0082 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Morocco?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Morocco rank globally for rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Chile ranks 75th and Morocco ranks 78th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Morocco: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/morocco/">Chile vs Morocco: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,836 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.