Chile vs Mexico: Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Chile
0.0575 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
0.0507 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
75th
Mexico rank
77th

Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Chile
  • Mexico
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0575 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0507 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 0.0068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.

Chile ranks 75th and Mexico ranks 77th of 102 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Mexico in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0417 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0693 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0276 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 0.0473 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0958 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0485 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 0.0728 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1108 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0379 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 0.0632 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.078 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0148 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 0.0692 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0136 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.0776 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0456 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.0692 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0528 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0163 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Chile or Mexico?
Chile, at 0.0575 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0507 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Chile and Mexico?
0.0068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Mexico rank globally for rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Chile ranks 75th and Mexico ranks 77th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mexico: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/mexico/">Chile vs Mexico: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,836 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.