Burundi vs Ecuador: Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Burundi
1.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
2.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
29th
Ecuador rank
27th

Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Burundi
  • Ecuador
01234196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 2.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Burundi, a difference of 0.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Burundi ranks 29th and Ecuador ranks 27th of 102 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0421 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3246 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2824 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.0934 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3829 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2895 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.3046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.775 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4704 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.6585 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 1.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.438 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 1.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0343 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Burundi or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 2.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Burundi as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Burundi and Ecuador?
0.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Ecuador rank globally for rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Burundi ranks 29th and Ecuador ranks 27th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Ecuador: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/burundi/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/burundi/ecuador/">Burundi vs Ecuador: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,836 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.