Brazil vs Costa Rica: Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Brazil
0.4813 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica
0.583 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
48th
Costa Rica rank
45th

Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Brazil
  • Costa Rica
0.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.583 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4813 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.1017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 48th and Costa Rica ranks 45th of 102 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6329 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3404 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
1970s 0.3568 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7325 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 0.4548 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 0.4455 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 0.5421 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 0.5511 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 0.5125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9171 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Brazil or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 0.583 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4813 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Brazil and Costa Rica?
0.1017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Costa Rica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Costa Rica rank globally for rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Brazil ranks 48th and Costa Rica ranks 45th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Costa Rica: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/brazil/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/brazil/costa-rica/">Brazil vs Costa Rica: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,836 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.