Bhutan vs Malawi: Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Bhutan
0.4184 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
0.5156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
50th
Malawi rank
47th

Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Bhutan
  • Malawi
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.5156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4184 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0972 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 50th and Malawi ranks 47th of 102 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 6 and Malawi in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3432 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 0.4227 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2536 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1691 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 0.481 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1452 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3358 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 0.473 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2846 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1883 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 0.5875 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3698 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2177 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 0.7668 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2867 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 0.4523 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5816 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1293 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Bhutan or Malawi?
Malawi, at 0.5156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4184 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Bhutan and Malawi?
0.0972 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Malawi?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Malawi rank globally for rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Bhutan ranks 50th and Malawi ranks 47th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Malawi: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/malawi/">Bhutan vs Malawi: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,836 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.