Bangladesh vs World: Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Bangladesh
182.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
World
2.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
1st
World rank
1st

Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Bangladesh
  • World
050100150200196119922023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 182.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in World, a difference of 179.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 75.2 times World's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 1st and World ranks 1st of 102 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh World Difference Ahead
1960s 47.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.971 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 46.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1970s 53.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 51.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 67.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 65.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 82.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 80.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 119.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 117.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 156.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 153.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 173.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 171.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Bangladesh or World?
Bangladesh, at 182.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in World as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Bangladesh and World?
179.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and World?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and World rank globally for rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Bangladesh ranks 1st and World ranks 1st of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs World: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/world/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/world/">Bangladesh vs World: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,836 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.