Angola vs Eswatini: Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Angola
0.0125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0.0227 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
87th
Eswatini rank
85th

Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Angola
  • Eswatini
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0227 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.0102 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.8 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Angola ranks 87th and Eswatini ranks 85th of 102 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1401 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1321 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.0066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1199 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1133 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0654 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0634 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.0031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0241 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.0025 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0071 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.0076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0192 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0.0056 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0227 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0171 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Angola or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.0227 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Angola and Eswatini?
0.0102 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Eswatini rank globally for rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Angola ranks 87th and Eswatini ranks 85th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Eswatini: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/angola/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/angola/eswatini/">Angola vs Eswatini: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,836 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.